| 000 | 01016cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS48019 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u64471 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aTubb v Surrey CC | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v(1992) 32 RVR 244-246(3) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 31 May 1992. The level of compensation payable to T for the compulsory purchase of his woodland was the central issue of this hearing. Further consideration was given to the site`s location in metropolitan green belt. Contending that the land had development potential and that the planning policies` relaxation had been widely called for, T originally claimed £25,000. He was awarded £380 with no order as to costs. | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPENSATION | ||
| 650 |
_aCompulsory purchase _96228 |
||
| 650 | _aGREEN BELT | ||
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c40158 _d40158 |
||