| 000 | 00954cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS48038 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u64571 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aStepien, K. | ||
| 245 | _aProperty briefing | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors` Journal _v137(5) 12 February 1993, 129(1) |
||
| 520 | _aCA ruled in "Benn v Hardinge" 13 October that prolonged non-use of a right of way by the owner of a dominant tenement was not in itself sufficient grounds to assume its abandonment. Following precedent in "Gotobed v Pridmore" the judgement stated there must be a clear intention to abandon. The article also considers protection against distress for unpaid rent. | ||
| 650 | _aACCESS | ||
| 650 | _aDISTRESS | ||
| 650 | _aEASEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aIMPOUNDED GOODS | ||
| 650 | _aTITLE | ||
| 690 | _aHIGHWAYS RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c40225 _d40225 |
||