| 000 | 01415cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS52177 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u64700 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBromley LBC v SoS Environment and another | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1994) 68 PCR 493-503(11) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 13 January 1994. A set of buildings previously used for agricultural purposes and now redundant were being used as offices and for storage of scaffolding and building materials. B issued two enforcement notices, one requiring cessation of office use and one the removal of the scaffolding and other materials. An Inspector quashed the notices on appeal and granted permission for use of the yard for non-agricultural purposes. B appealed. This was allowed on the grounds that the Inspector had wrongly made a decision about the building without regard to the open land and had not considered whether it was appropriate in a rural area within the meaning of PPG2 para 13. | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL USE | ||
| 650 | _aBROMLEY LBC V SOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 650 | _aCHANGE OF USE | ||
| 650 | _aENFORCEMENT NOTICES | ||
| 650 | _aFARM BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE 2 (GREEN BELTS) | ||
| 650 | _aREDUNDANT BUILDINGS | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c40309 _d40309 |
||