| 000 | 01139cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS50902 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u760 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aAllied Dunbar Assurance plc v Fowle and others | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) 25 EG 149-155(7) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 28 January 1994. Appeals brought against tenants by the landlord for not complying with the obligations as set out in a lease, resulting in arrears of rent, service charges and insurance premiums were dismissed on the grounds that the lease was deemed never to have vested in the Crown, hence the Crown cannot have disclaimed. The issues concerned whether or not the sureties liability was discharged by the Crown disclaimer of a lease, and whether the liability was revived on restoration of a dissolved company. | ||
| 650 | _aASSIGNMENT | ||
| 650 | _aCROWN DISCLAIMERS | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aSTACEY V HILL | ||
| 650 | _aSURETIES LIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aSURETY COVENANTS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c404 _d404 |
||