| 000 | 01080cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS52188 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u65086 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aWolfson, D. | ||
| 245 | _aMortgages | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Law Journal _v148(6678) 13 January 1995, 22(1) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines recent case law which has challenged the decision in "Barclays Bank plc v O`Brien" (1993 4 All ER 417) which set out the circumstances in which a surety may rely on undue influence or misrepresentation by the principal debtor to resist liability to a creditor pursuant to a charge or guarantee. | ||
| 650 | _aALLIED IRISH BANK V BYRNE | ||
| 650 | _aBANCO-EXTERIOR V MANN | ||
| 650 | _aBANK MELLI IRAN V SAMADI-RAD | ||
| 650 | _aDUTY OF DISCLOSURE | ||
| 650 | _aMATRIMINIAL HOME | ||
| 650 | _aMIDLAND BANK V MASSEY | ||
| 650 | _aMIDLAND BANK V SERTER | ||
| 650 | _aSECURITY | ||
| 650 | _aTSB BANK PLC V CAMFIELD | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c40567 _d40567 |
||