| 000 | 01655cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS48176 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u65345 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aColtman Precast Concrete Limited v W & J Simons (Contractors) Limited | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v1993 CILL 814-816(3) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 18 January 1993. S were main contractors for a new stand at a cricket club. The contract was JCT Private Without Quantities Standard Form, 1980 edition. C were nominated subcontractors to supply and fix re-cast concrete decking units. The intention was to complete the appropriate forms of nominated subcontract agreements but, as often happens, C did not return the subcontract duly signed. S waived the stipulation stating that `this order will only become valid after we have received a signed copy of the subcontract` and relations were taken to be governed by standard forms. A sub-subcontractor, W, was engaged by C to carry out mastic jointing of the precast concrete units. This gave rise to allegations of defective work and a letter from S to C demanded £22,000 and threatened to initiate arbitration proceedings if the demand was not met. C issued a writ against S demanding £2,373 for retention monies and an alleged underpayment of £119. S applied for arbitration. The court ordere | ||
| 650 | _aDEFECTIVE WORK | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aNOMINATED SUBCONTRACTORS | ||
| 650 | _aSUB-SUBCONTRACTORS | ||
| 650 | _aSUBCONTRACTORS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c40749 _d40749 |
||