| 000 | 01532cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS52197 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u65400 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aIntercity Property Consultants Limited v Black Country DC | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v(1994) 34 RVR 232-271(40) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 27 May 1994. B compulsorily purchased X`s freehold interest in a piece of derelict land. X had the benefit of a right of way to the main road over land owned by a third party. Various planning permissions had been issued on the land. X put forward two approaches to valuation claiming £1,235,000 in respect of land taken, one based on valuation of the land in its current unreclaimed state with planning permission and the second based on the value of the land for built development following reclamation and with the benefit of improved access. B claimed there was no planning permission current on the site for the use mentioned and that cheaper access routes could be built. LT held that the valuation should be £609,774 based on £600,000 for the freehold interest and £9,774 for the costs of preparing the claim. | ||
| 650 | _aACCESS ROAD | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPENSATION | ||
| 650 |
_aCompulsory purchase _96228 |
||
| 650 | _aINTERCITY PROPERTY CONSULTANTS LTD V BLACK COUNTRY DC | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 |
_aValuation _96273 |
||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c40780 _d40780 |
||