000			01667cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS48199
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u65430
041			_aeng
245			_aSingh v Rochdale MBC
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1993) 65 PCR 75-84(6)
520			_aLT 10 August 1992. Several items of compensation were agreed concerning the compulsory purchase of a long leasehold in a two storey building occupied at the material date as a shop with living accommodation however other items remained outstanding and were refered to the LT. They concerned the dates on which the property was vested in the acquiring authority, on which the compensation fell to be assessed and from which interest was payable on the compensation money; the extend to which interest from a bridging loan made necessary by the loss of the property should be off set against the statutory interest payable and the amount of compensation for loss of profit. A vesting declaration was made on 8 November 1988 and the authority took possession on 26 May 1989. S claimed that as the 28 day period of notice referred to in the notice expired on 7 December that was the date on which the property was vested in the authority. The authority claimed that a series of notices had been issued
650			_aBRIDGING LOAN
650			_aCOMPULSORY PURCHASE (VESTING DECLARATIONS) ACT 1981
650			_aMATERAIL DATE
650			_aVESTING DECLARATIONS
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c40798 _d40798