000			01423cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS48228
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u65565
041			_aeng
245			_aHughes v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of£ Greenwich
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1993) 65 PCR 12-17(3)
520			_aCA 20 May 1992. The respondent was the headmaster at a school maintained by the appellant council as successors to the GLC and ILEA. In 1963 the authority had built a house in the grounds of the school as the headmasters house and the respondent, H, moved in. H`s contract of employment entitled him to free board and lodging but contained no express provision that he occupied the house for the better performance of his duties. In 1989 H commenced proceedings claiming right to buy under Housing Act 1985. The judge found in favour of H. The council appealed. This was dismissed on the grounds that a term requiring H to occupy the house was not to implied in his contract therefore H did not fall within the exception in Schedule 1 of the Act. He was a secure tenant and qualified for the right to buy.
650			_aHOUSNG ACT 1985
650			_aRIGHT TO BUY
650			_aSCHOOL HOUSE
650			_aSECURE TENANCY
650			_aTIED HOUSE
690			_aHOUSING-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c40890 _d40890