| 000 | 01698cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS53847 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u6884 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aFriends` Provident Life Office v Hillier Parker May & Rowden (a firm) (Estates and General plc and others, third parties) | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aAll England Law Reports _v(1995) 4 All ER 260-282(23) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 3 April 1995. F and H entered into an agreement whereby they would share development costs of a shopping centre. Part of H`s responsibilities involved checking and authorising payment of developer`s claims for F`s share of development costs. H recommended these payments, which (wrongly) included a figure for notional interest. F issued proceedings against H for breach of contract and negligence, claiming damages for interest paid. H issued third party proceedings against the developers, claiming contribution pursuant to Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 s1(1) and s6(1) The court below struck out the third-party claims. H`s appeal allowed, finding that damages were alike - so allowing contribution claim, and that any damage was suffered within the meaning of the 1978 Act. | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aCIVIL LIABILITY (CONTRIBUTION) ACT 1978 | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aFRIENDS PROVIDENT LIFE OFFICE V HILLIER PARKER | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aNOTIONAL INTEREST | ||
| 650 | _aRESTITUTIONARY CLAIM | ||
| 650 | _aTHIRD PARTY PROCEEDINGS | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c4096 _d4096 |
||