000			01519cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS48259
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u65758
041			_aeng
245			_aLaura Investment Co Ltd v Havering LBC (No 2)
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1993) 08 EG 120-122(3)
520			_aChD 27 July 1992. This is an adjourned hearing of an originating summons on the construction of a rent review clause. The first question raised was whether rent should be assessed on the assumption that buildings erected on the land since the grant of the lease were included in the hypothetical demise (Abs46611). The second question, raised by an amendment on behalf of the defendants, is whether the rent should be assessed on the assumption that the premises are let with vacant possession or subject to the tenancies which exist at the date of the rent review. The case was held in favour of the defendants on the grounds that underlettings were contemplated in the lease and the parties intended the rent to be calculated on an assumption of reality. Unless the rent review provision is construed to assume that the premises are in fact underlet, the defendants were bound to be putting themselves in a position in which, on a rent, they would be paying to the landlords a higher rent then th
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
650			_aVACANT POSSESSION
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c41045 _d41045