| 000 | 00925cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS53855 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u6931 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aNicholls v Wimbledon Valuation Office Agency & another | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v(1995) 35 RVR 171(1) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 12 July 1995. The appellant claimed that his home was not subject to council tax, being a floating structure (not a boat) and not being fixed to land with a necessary degree of permanence. Appeal dismissed as the issue of permanence (whether agreed or not) was not raised at the valuation tribunal. | ||
| 650 | _aCOUNCIL TAX | ||
| 650 | _aFLOATING HOMES | ||
| 650 | _aGENERAL RATE ACT 1967 S115(1) | ||
| 650 | _aHEREDITAMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aPERMANENCE | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c4125 _d4125 |
||