| 000 | 01173cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3102-33 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u66047 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aDemolition | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1995) EGCS 205(1) (7/1/95) |
||
| 520 | _a"Shimizu (UK) Ltd v Westminster CC" CA 20 December 1994. S, owners of a listed building, had been refused permission to demolish certain features but had been granted compensation under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 s27. The compensating authority (W) appealed and it was held that the LT had erred in distinguishing between demolition and alteration (see Abs50629). | ||
| 650 | _aCHIMNEYS | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPENSATION | ||
| 650 | _aLISTED BUILDING CONSENT | ||
| 650 | _aLISTED BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING (LISTED BUILDING AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990 S27 | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aQUANTAS HOUSE | ||
| 650 | _aREFUSAL | ||
| 650 | _aSHIMIZU V WESTMINSTER CC | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c41277 _d41277 |
||