000			01266cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS48304
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u66070
041			_aeng
245			_aReed v SoS for the Environment and Tandridge DC
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1993 JPL 249-253(3)
520			_aQBD 6 May 1992. The appellant had an agricultural holding in the Metropolitan Green Belt and was served by the council with 10 enforcement notices alleging change of use of certain buildings on the holding. There was no planning permission for these uses. The appellant appealed against the enforcement notices but this was dismissed. They appealed to the High Court. It was held that each enforcement notice should be considered individually as permission could not be refused for use of a particular site by virtue of uses on other sites unless there is a convincing and legitimate reason.
650			_aCHANGE OF USE
650			_aENFORCMENT NOTICES
650			_aGREEN BELT
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S177(5)
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1991
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c41291 _d41291