000			01570cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS48324
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u66191
041			_aeng
245			_aWest Faulkner Associates v London Borough of Newham
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v1993 CILL 802-804(3)
520			_aChD 1 October 1992. The architects (W) were employed by the council to act in respect of refurbishment work for a housing association. The essence of the contract required W `to do and perform all acts, matters and things which are commonly done and performed by Chartered Architects according to the practice of their profession in relation to the works`. The contract did not impose any absolute duties on W. The council entered into a contract with a building contractor M in the form of JCT Contract for use by local authorities with quantities 1963 edition (1977 Revision) subject to the councils standard amendments. M began work but there were delays due to spending too long on each block which created uncertainty for the tenants leading to the council having to pay compensation to them. The council and W were unwilling to give notice under clause 25 of the contract as they considered that M were not failing to proceed regularly and diligently with the works. The council negotiated a
650			_aBREACH OF CONTRACT
650			_aJCT 1963
650			_aNOTICES
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c41379 _d41379