000			01030cab a2200193 4500
001			WB2605-41
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u66221
041			_aeng
245			_aArrears of rent
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aEGCS _v1990 3
520			_aIn Verrilli v Idigoras , CA 19 January 1990, the appeal was allowed and the judgement set aside with an order for a new trial. If the recorder had been aware of the circumstances and of the reasons why the appellant had applied for the adjournment, he would not possibly have refused it . The appellant was a foreigner and was taken by surprise by the procedure. It was not known what order the recorder might have made had he made further enquiries as to why the appellant`s solicitor was not present and as to the appellant`s means and ability to pay off rent arrears . There had been a miscarriage of justice.
650			_aRENT ACT 1977
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c41401 _d41401