| 000 | 01179cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X642 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u66731 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aFox v SoS Environment and Dover DC | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1993 JPl 448-455(8) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 8 June 1992. Planning application inquiry. Allegation of bias. Inspector lunching with and travelling to the site of the site visit with council witnesses. Appellant allegedly consented. Test for bias. The Deputy Judge held that the principle of law was whether justice was manifestly and undoubtedly seen to be done by the Inspector. the test to be applied to the facts was whether there existed grounds on which a reasonable person would think that there was a real likelihood of bias. Case headnote. | ||
| 650 | _aBIAS | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF RULES OF NATURAL JUSTICE | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING APPLICATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING INQUIRIES | ||
| 650 | _aRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aSITE INSPECTION | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c41688 _d41688 |
||