000			01402cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS48456
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u66848
041			_aeng
245			_aPrudential Property Services Ltd v Capital Land Holdings Ltd
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v1993 15 EG 147-154(6)
520			_aChD 16 November 1992. Whether a letter constituted a valid counternotice to landlord`s trigger notice. Tenant`s nominee holds a lease for a 20-year term from 21 May 1982 with four yearly reviews. The landlord must serve notice at least three months before rent review date specifying the rent required. If the parties fail to agree a rent within a month of the notice, upon receipt of a counternotice, the matter shall be determined by an independent surveyor. Following service of a notice by C on 14 February 1990 specifying a rent of £17,500 pa for the review at 21 May 1990, a letter was sent by P acknowledging receipt stating non-agreement to the rent. Upon expiry of the time limit, C asserted that P had failed to serve an effective counter notice. Held that letter was an effective counternotice, declaration granted accordingly.
650			_aCOUNTER NOTICE
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
650			_aTRIGGER NOTICES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c41774 _d41774