| 000 | 00857cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS52228 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u66855 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aPowell-Smith, V. | ||
| 245 | _aReceivership is not a contract breach | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v377(6010) 2 February 1995, 12(1) |
||
| 520 | _a"Perar BV v General Surety & Guarantee" CA 1994 highlights the problems of wording in performance bonds and the interpretation of `default` in cases of administrative receivership. | ||
| 650 | _aADMINISTRATIVE RECEIVERSHIP | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aDEFAULT | ||
| 650 | _aJCT DESIGN AND BUILD FORM 1981 | ||
| 650 | _aPERFORMANCE BONDS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c41779 _d41779 |
||