000			01408cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS48457
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u66857
041			_aeng
245			_aSalomon v Akiens
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v1993 14 EG 97-100(4)
520			_aCA 30 October 1992. Appeal by A against a CC decision granting a possession order to S. A, a tenant by assignment whose contractual lease expired on 29 September 1987 remained in possession under a continuation tenancy under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II. S served notice under s25 of the 1954 Act terminating the tenancy stating that grant of a new tenancy would be opposed on grounds of persistent delay in paying rent. A served a counternotice. Both parties continued to negotiate a new lease through solicitors with correspondence marked `subject to contract` and `subject to lease`. A`s solicitor failed to apply to the Court for a new lease. Use of the terms `subject to contract` and `contract to lease` did not mean that A could rely on S agreeing to a new lease. Appeal dismissed,
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954
650			_aLEASE RENEWAL
650			_aPOSSESSION ORDER
650			_aSUBJECT TO CONTRACT
650			_aSUBJECT TO LEASE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c41781 _d41781