000			00899cab a2200205 4500
001			WB2525-18
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u66980
041			_aeng
245			_aLodgers or tenants?
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aIndependent _v28/6/89 p8
520			_aIn Aslan v Murphy No 1 and No 2 ; Wynne v Duke CA 27 June 1989 it was held that if an agreement between the owner of premises and the occupier was not a sham, in deciding whether the occupier was a lodger or a tenant, the court should consider whether in the light of the factual situation, its provisions were part of the true bargain between the parties or were pretences.
650			_aLEASE
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c41876 _d41876