000			01666cab a2200229 4500
001			X704
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u67126
041			_aeng
245			_aArbitrator and misconduct - a surprising case
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aCS Monthly : Rural Practice _v2(8) May 1993, 10(1)
520			_a"Everett and others v Barribal" (1993) Lincoln County Court. Landlord served notice to pay; tenant paid all the rent except the owner`s drainage rate which he deducted before paying the drainage authority. landlord gave notice to quit. Arbitration raised numerous issues as to estoppel, set-off, counterclaim etc. Arbitrator awarded in favour of landlord and said his award was available to be taken up on payment of his costs of over £21000. The tenant declined to pay. The landlord paid eventually, more tha 21 days after the making of the award. On one interpretation the tennat was out of time for appealing before he knew the contents of the award. Tenant applied to have the award set aside, remitted or varied and sought leave to appeal out of time. The landlord opposed the application. Held: leave to appeal was not needed as time did not start to run until the tenant received the award. This is contrary to a long line of commercial arbitration cases. The arbitrator was guilty of miscon
650			_aARBITRATORS' AWARDS
650			_aCOSTS
650			_aMISCONDUCT
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c41998 _d41998