000			01716cab a2200217 4500
001			X754
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u67329
041			_aeng
245			_aR v Plymouth CC, J Sainsbury plc, Estates and Agency Holdings plc, Tesco Stores Ltd, Vospers Motor House (Plymouth) Ltd, ex p Plymouth and South Devon Co-operative Society Ltd
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1993 JPL 538-565(27)
520			_aQBD 1 February 1993. Superstores - retail - developers` offers of community benefit - policy for community benefits in emerging local plan - three rival sites - judicial review - section 106 agreement - 1990 Act s70(2) - fairly and reasonably relate to development permitted - necessary to grant of planning permission - review of authorities on planning gain - Circular 16/91 Annex B - held that the true test of materiality is whether the conditions or obligations are imposed for a planning purpose and not an ulterior one, fairly and reasonably relate to the development permitted, and are not so unreasonable that no reasonable planning authority could have imposed them. The necessary nexus relates to the requirement, fairly and reasonably related. the benefits as offered passed the tests - each aspect of the test was satisfied. The benefits were given appropriate weight and were not the determining factors which led to the grant - the permissions were based on planning issues and on th
650			_aCOMMUNITY BENEFITS
650			_aPLANNING GAIN
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S70
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c42138 _d42138