000			01130cab a2200205 4500
001			X755
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u67331
041			_aeng
245			_aVan Dyck v SoS Environment and Southend on Sea BC; Doncaster BC v SOS Environment and Dunhill
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1993 JPL 565-579(15)
520			_aSingle dwelling-houses - subdivision into two more separate dwellings - application of the four year rule - Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s172(4)c) - conflicting High Court decisions - CA held that s172(4)(c) was capable of being construed so to benefit all new separate residences after four years - subsequent consideration of Pepper v Hart - s172(4)(c) ambiguous and obscure, the statements relied on were those of the minister but they lacked clarity and therefore the Parliamentary material had to be set aside.
650			_aFOUR YEAR RULE
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S172(4)(C)
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c42140 _d42140