000			01074cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS48565
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u67376
041			_aeng
245			_aLehmann and another v Herman
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1993) 16 EG 124-127(4)
520			_aChD 16 October 1992. Hearing of an originating summons by L to determine the validity of a notice London Building Acts (Amendment) Act 1939 s47, served on behalf of H. At issue was whether notice given on behalf of one joint tenant only, was valid. L questioned the validity of the notice arguing that it should have been given on behalf of H and his wife as joint tenants, and not on behalf of H alone. Held, the notice was invalid. H and his wife would constitute the "building owner" under the 1939 Act for the purpose of serving a notice under s47.
650			_aBUILDING OWNER
650			_aNOTICE
650			_aParty walls _96258
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c42168 _d42168