| 000 | 01283cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS48660 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u67858 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLuttenberger v North Thoresby Farms Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1993) 17 EG 102-109(8) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 21 December 1992. Centres on the implications of expiry of a notice to quit under case D for non-payment of rent. The plaintiff (L) was freeholder of a farm tenanted by the first defendant (N). N was a company whose shares were owned by the second and third defendants. Rent was payable half-yearly. One month after a due date with no rent forthcoming L`s solicitor served notice to pay within two months. Payment was sent but with only one signature on the cheque. The cheque was eventually resubmitted with the additional signature. L sought an order for possession following expiry of the notice to quit. Held; that the order should be granted. | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aNON-PAYMENT OF RENT | ||
| 650 | _aNOTICE TO QUIT | ||
| 650 | _aVALIDITY | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c42514 _d42514 |
||