| 000 | 01022cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | W4609 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u68096 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMaterial considerations | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1993) EGCS 55 (27/3/93) (1) |
||
| 520 | _aIn "Speyroc Construction Ltd v SoS Environment and another" QBD 15 March 1993 S had already extended industrial premises and wished to extend them further. Application for a second extension was refused. S questioned whether this was reasonably refused and whether there was inconsistency of planning control. Application refused on the grounds that although the planning applications were similar the inspector was justified in reaching his opinion. | ||
| 650 | _aEXTENSION | ||
| 650 | _aMANSARD ROOF | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING DECISIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c42691 _d42691 |
||