| 000 | 01027cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2848-42 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u68181 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLandlord and Tenanct Act 1954 | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1992) EGCS 144(2) (5/12/1992) |
||
| 520 | _a"Methodist Secondary Schools Trust Deed Trustees v O`Leary" CA 24 November 1992. M contested the notice to quit served by the landlord L, and the allegation that a school caretaker`s house constituted `business premises`, claiming that there was no breach of the tenancy agreement. Their appeal was dismissed and their counterclaim for a new tenancy rejected. | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aEMPLOYMENT DUTIES | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II | ||
| 650 | _aRESIDENTIAL ACCOMMODATION | ||
| 650 | _aSCHOOL CARETAKER | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c42754 _d42754 |
||