000			01260cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS48739
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u68362
041			_aeng
245			_aBrown v Tiernan
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1993) 18 EG 134-136(3)
520			_aChD 10 November 1992. An agreement for use of a paddock for grazing. The defendant (T) claimed the agreement made between the plaintiff (B) and the previous owner of T`s property was for the grazing use only for a period of 10 months, May to March, when the daffodils were not in bloom (within a proviso in s2(3)(a) Agricultural Holdings Act 1986). B did not graze cattle in the paddock between March and May, but he did graze a mare. B contended that the agreement was to graze throughout the year. It was "held" that the agreement was an agricultural tenancy and s2(3)(a) of the Act did not affect the use.
650			_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986 S2(3)(A)
650			_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986
650			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
650			_aDAFFODILS
650			_aGRAZING AGREEMENTS
690			_aRURAL PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c42895 _d42895