000			01419cab a2200301 4500
001			ABS48753
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u68419
041			_aeng
100			_aBeaumont, B.
245			_aStrict rules of evidence as to documents and conduct of the arbitrator
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aArbitration and Dispute Resolution Law Journal _vJune 1993, 90-99(10)
520			_aIn "Fairclough Building Ltd v Vale of Belvoir Superstore Ltd" (1990) F appealed against an arbitration award, maintaining the arbitrator had made errors in law concerning proof of documents. The arbitrator had failed to make clear that some documents needed to be proved and, if not proved, would not be considered. The matter of proof of evidence is considered here with the author also finding fault with F for not seeking removal of the arbitrator earlier but awaiting the outcome of the award first.
650			_aADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE
650			_aARBITRATION ACT 1979 S1(3)
650			_aARBITRATORS' AWARDS
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
650			_aCLAIMS
650			_aDOCUMENTS
650			_aEVIDENCE
650			_aEXTENSION OF TIME
650			_aPROOF OF DOCUMENTS
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c42927 _d42927