| 000 | 00954cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS48768 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u68471 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aLloyd, H. | ||
| 245 | _aReferee`s swansong defines JCT80 `conditions` | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v258(7798) 11 June 1993, 24(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses a case, which considered the meaning of `similar conditions` in JCT 1980 cl 13.5. The court held that the arbitrator was wrong in not confining his examination to written contract documents in his efforts to decide if work done was carried out under `similar conditions` to the work set out in the contract bills. | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aJCT 1980 CL13.5 | ||
| 650 | _aSIMILAR CONDITIONS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c42960 _d42960 |
||