000			01598cab a2200217 4500
001			X970
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u68472
041			_aeng
245			_aBarnet Meeting Room Trust v SoS for the Environment and Barnet LBC
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1993 JPL 739-761(23)
520			_aQBD 24 July 1992. Meeting Room for worship - edge of Green Belt - ministerial policy on Green Belt - appeal considered - relevance off previous ministerial decisions - application Pehrsson test of appropriateness - PPG2 (1988) para 13 `institutions standing in extensive grounds` - appeal to High Court - Auld J held that (1) Whether a prosposed developmentmet the description of `institution standing in extensive grounds` was in most cases a metter of fact and degree and planning judgement. (2) The ministers decsion was unfair to the Trust by reason of inconsitancy of the interpretationof policy. (3) There was a technical misapplication of the Pehrsson test as to `very special circumstances`. The SoS whilst not in terms following the precise sequence of reasoning indicated by Pehrsson had done so in substance when his decision latter was read as a whole. (4) Even if the SoS is deemd to know all the decisions notionally made by him it would not have made any difference to the outcome of
650			_aGREEN BELT
650			_aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE 2
650			_aRELIGIOUS BUILDINGS
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c42961 _d42961