000			01211cab a2200277 4500
001			ABS48848
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u68805
041			_aeng
245			_aBooth and Booth v British Coal Corporation
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v(1993) RVR 65-69(5)
520			_aLT 11 November 1992. The court had preliminary issues to decide: whether the claimants were required to complete another damage notice or could rely on one made some years earlier, since when only emergency repairs had been carried out on the property, affected by mining subsidence, and whether a deferment notice had been served by the corporation and subsequently revoked. The tribunal found in favour of the claimants, who relied on Coal Mining (Subsidence) Act 1957 s3(3).
650			_aCOAL MINING (SUBSIDENCE) ACT 1957
650			_aCOAL MINING
650			_aCOMPENSATION
650			_aDAMAGE NOTICE
650			_aMINING SUBSIDENCE
650			_aREPAIRS
650			_aSUBSIDENCE
690			_aCOMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION-CASE LAW
690			_aMINING AND MINERALS-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c43191 _d43191