000			01315cab a2200325 4500
001			WB2830-36
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u68877
041			_aeng
245			_aLiability for negligence
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(9229) 25 July 1992, 127(1)
520			_aPoints raised in "E Hobbs (Farms) Ltd v Baxenden Chemical Co Ltd; Gerber Foods (Holdings) Ltd v E Hobbs (Farms) Ltd" 1992. Hobbs was found to have been negligent in the spread of fire to neighbouring property because care was not taken to remove rubbish before an operation, which involved a fire risk. However, in the first claim suppliers of foam to Hobbs were wrong not to have notified clients that the product was not as fire-resistant as they had been led to believe. The judge said a manufacturer`s duty of care did not end when the goods had been sold.
650			_aBREACH OF COVENANT
650			_aDAMAGES
650			_aDUTY OF CARE
650			_aECONOMIC LOSS
650			_aFIRE DAMAGE
650			_aFIRE RESISTANCE
650			_aFIRE
650			_aINSULATING FOAM
650			_aMANUFACTURERS
650			_aNEGLIGENCE
650			_aQUIET ENJOYMENT
690			_aLAW
690			_aRURAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c43243 _d43243