000 01171cab a2200289 4500
001 ABS48870
008 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035 _a(Sirsi) u68907
041 _aeng
245 _aNegligence and time-limits
260 _c1993
350 _a0
490 _aEstates Gazette
_v(9322( 5 June 1993, 108(1)
520 _aDiscusses the decision "Felton v Gaskill Osbourne & Co" (1992), in which the plaintiff successfully claimed for damages for a negligent survey after dropping claims for certain items, which had been noticed and rectified at an earlier date, in anticipation of the defendant`s argument that action over these items was statute barred by limitation. Citing Limitation Act 1980 s14A, the remainder of the plaintiff`s claim was upheld. Appears to contradict "Horbury v Craig Hall & Rutley" (1992).
650 _aCHIMNEY
650 _aDAMP
650 _aDEFECTS
650 _aLATENT DAMAGE ACT 1986
650 _aLIMITATION ACT 1980 S14
650 _aMORTGAGE VALUATION
650 _aNEGLIGENCE
650 _aSURVEYORS
690 _aLAW
690 _aPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942 _n0
948 _c04/03/1997
999 _c43263
_d43263