| 000 | 01171cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS48870 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u68907 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aNegligence and time-limits | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9322( 5 June 1993, 108(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the decision "Felton v Gaskill Osbourne & Co" (1992), in which the plaintiff successfully claimed for damages for a negligent survey after dropping claims for certain items, which had been noticed and rectified at an earlier date, in anticipation of the defendant`s argument that action over these items was statute barred by limitation. Citing Limitation Act 1980 s14A, the remainder of the plaintiff`s claim was upheld. Appears to contradict "Horbury v Craig Hall & Rutley" (1992). | ||
| 650 | _aCHIMNEY | ||
| 650 | _aDAMP | ||
| 650 | _aDEFECTS | ||
| 650 | _aLATENT DAMAGE ACT 1986 | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION ACT 1980 S14 | ||
| 650 | _aMORTGAGE VALUATION | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aSURVEYORS | ||
| 690 | _aLAW | ||
| 690 | _aPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c43263 _d43263 |
||