| 000 | 00903cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2814-31 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u69027 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSuitability of home for baby | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v30 March 1992, 10(1) |
||
| 520 | _a"R v Medina BC, ex parte Dee" QBD 24 March 1992. In determining whether the applicant was homeless, having left accommodation thought by a doctor and health visitor to be unfit for a new born baby, the authority was to consider the effect the decision would have on all those involved, here the baby, not just on the applicant. | ||
| 650 | _aBABY | ||
| 650 | _aHOMELESS | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING ACT 1985 S58 | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING AND PLANNING ACT 1986 S14(2) | ||
| 650 | _aUNFIT ACCOMMODATION | ||
| 690 | _aHOUSING-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c43355 _d43355 |
||