| 000 | 01278cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS48996 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u69400 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aFrench v Commercial Union Life Assurance Co plc & another | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1993) 24 EG 115-118(4) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 21 December 1992. The appellant, F, took the assignment of a retail tenancy with an annual rent of £10,475. C terminated the tenancy but did not oppose F`s application for a new one. At county court a new rent of £36,098 was fixed but was contested by F on appeal, as was the interim rent. In CA new weight was given to expert opinion and comparable evidence, and the earlier decision to disregard the known removal of Sainsbury`s from adjoining premises was overturned. Held in F`s favour. | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPARABLES | ||
| 650 | _aDISREGARDS | ||
| 650 | _aEXPERT EVIDENCE | ||
| 650 | _aINTERIM RENT | ||
| 650 | _aKINGFISHER SHOPPING CENTRE REDDITCH | ||
| 650 | _aNEW RENT | ||
| 650 | _aNEW TENANCY | ||
| 650 | _aREDDITCH | ||
| 650 | _aREDUCTION | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c43589 _d43589 |
||