000			01362cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS48997
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u69404
041			_aeng
245			_aMurphy v Sawyer-Hoare and another
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(9327) 10 July 1993, 127-129(3)
520			_aChD 23 September 1992. M granted premises to a firm who later assigned it to S. The second defendant was party to the licence as surety, and when the defendant went into liquidation, was called upon by M, in accordance with the licence terms, to take a new lease on the property. However, a disclaimer had been issued by the liquidator some weeks previously. M obtained a judgment for rent arrears from the date of disclaimer. On appeal the second defendant argued that the disclaimer`s effect was to free him from liability and that M was not entitled to include a rent review clause in the new lease implementing an earlier review from the orginal lease. "Held" in the defendant`s favour.
650			_aASSIGNMENT
650			_aDISCLAIMERS
650			_aLEASES
650			_aRENT ARREARS
650			_aSTACEY V HILL
650			_aSURETY
650			_aWARNFORD INVETMENTS LTD V DUCKWORTH
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c43590 _d43590