| 000 | 01324cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS48998 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u69411 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aR v Gravesend CC, ex parte Patchet | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1993) 26 EG 125-127(3) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 17 June 1992. P, a business tenant, applied for a new tenancy and the landlord sought determination of an interim rent at Gravesend County Court. That application was not attended to and no notice given to P, who, however, subsequently discontinued proceedings for the new tenancy. At that point it transpired that the interim rent application had not been served and so the landlord requested it be backdated. This the court did, thus prompting P`s application for judicial review of the decision. It was held that the court had no power to determine retrospectively, and therefore the backdated application was quashed. | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aINTERIM RENT | ||
| 650 | _aJUDICIAL REVIEW | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S24A | ||
| 650 | _aNEW TENANCY | ||
| 650 | _aRETROSPECTIVE DETERMINATION | ||
| 650 | _aTIME LIMITS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c43594 _d43594 |
||