000			01295cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS48999
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u69415
041			_aeng
245			_aWard-Lee v Linehan
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aAll England Law Reports _v(1993) 2 All ER 1006-1015(10)
520			_aCA 9 February 1993. W, having checked with the landlord, applied for renewal of her tenancy. However, the CC failed to serve the application on L who, once the time limit was reached, wrote to W announcing that the right to renew was void. W`s application to apply out of time was opposed as the landlord`s circumstances had changed. W lost the initial case to avoid prejudicing L`s position, but pressed for an appeal. The judge ruled that the lower court could have exercised discretion, though sparingly, as W had taken the correct steps in time and the fault for delay lay with the CC, W`s application should be upheld.
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
650			_aCCR ORD 13 R 4
650			_aCCR ORD 43 R 6(3)
650			_aCCR ORD 7 R 20
650			_aEXTENSION OF TIME
650			_aNEW TENANCY
650			_aTIME LIMITS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c43596 _d43596