| 000 | 00924cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3247-47 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u69519 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aDamages | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[1996] EGCS 187 (7/12/96) |
||
| 520 | _a"Bayoumi v Protim Services Ltd" CA 6 November 1996. The appellants could not plead want of consideration since the respondents acceptance of provision of the dehumidifier to reduce damp implied a promise to forbear from pursuing his statutory remedies in respect of unsuccessful remedial work. Appeal dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aBAYOUMI V PROTIM SERVICES LTD | ||
| 650 | _aDEFECTIVE PREMISES ACT 1972 | ||
| 650 | _aDISCHARGE OF DUTY | ||
| 650 | _aRENTAL INCOME | ||
| 650 | _aRISING DAMP | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c43665 _d43665 |
||