| 000 | 00985cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3215-13 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u69656 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aContractual stipulations | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[1996] EGCS 59(1) (6/4/96) |
||
| 520 | _a"Rotherham MBC v Frank Haslam Milan & Co Ltd and another" CA 22 March 1996. High Court awarded damages against contractors after cracks appeared in office development after completion. CA querying whether stipulations responsibility of contractors. Appeal by contractors allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACTORS | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACTUAL STIPULATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aCRACKS | ||
| 650 | _aFILL MATERIAL | ||
| 650 | _aFITNESS FOR PURPOSE | ||
| 650 | _aOFFICE DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aRESPONSIBILITY | ||
| 650 | _aSITE PREPARATION | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c43763 _d43763 |
||