000			01210cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS49059
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u69699
041			_aeng
245			_aBurton v Winters and another
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1993) 1 WLR 1077-1082(6)
520			_aCA 8 December 1992. In 1990, B claimed a mandatory injunction to remove part of a garage built by W`s predecessors in title which encroached on B`s land. Though the court gave a declaration that a wall was half over the boundary, it dismissed the injunction claim. Two years later, W won an injunction restraining B from trespass and interference. B was gaoled for repeated infringements but appealed to test entitlement to the right of self-abatement or self-redress. Appeal dismissed on the grounds that the right was for summary remedy not justified in the absence of an emergency.
650			_aBoundary disputes _96221
650			_aBoundary disputes _96221
650			_aENCROACHMENT
650			_aTRESPASS
690			_aHIGHWAYS RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c43799 _d43799