| 000 | 01261cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS49061 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u69710 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aWilson & another v Martin`s executors | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1993) 24 EG 119-122(4) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 21 December 1992. M, the defendants, successors in title to the Isenhurst estate, from which, in 1947, Sunset Farm had been sold to W`s predecessors including a Mr Howitt. Ownership of a wood between the two properties became disputed and in 1989, W fenced it and claimed a declaration and damages for trespass. At court this position was upheld; the judge was satisfied that H regarded the land as his and had passed on to W any rights gained by adverse possession. M appealed arguing that the presumption established in "Smirk v Lyndale Developments Ltd" should be applied and that there was insufficient evidence that H was in adverse possession at all material times. Held in M`s favour. | ||
| 650 | _aADVERSE POSSESSION | ||
| 650 | _aDISPOSSESSION | ||
| 650 | _aSQUATTERS RIGHTS | ||
| 650 | _aSQUATTING | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c43809 _d43809 |
||