000			01180cab a2200193 4500
001			W5046
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u70131
041			_aeng
245			_aVariation of agreement
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1993) EGCS 97(1) (29/5/93)
520			_a"B M Samuels Finance Group plc v Beechmanor Ltd and others" CA 20 May 1993. Refinancing was agreed between most of the parties involved in a development loan after the borrowers were unable to repay their debt. However one of the debtors was unaware of the agreement and had never consented to one of the parties being released. Dispute arose when the creditors called in the outstanding loan with interest and claimed possession of the houses given as surety. At the first trial, changes to the second agreement were deemed too great to be described as a variation and the judge ruled in favour of one of the defendants. The plaintiff`s appeal was allowed, however, and all defendants remained liable.
650			_aBRITISH MOTOR TRUST CO LTD V HYAMS 1934
690			_aLAW-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c44121 _d44121