| 000 | 01595cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS49128 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u70132 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLancashire and Cheshire Association of Baptist Churches Inc v Howard & Seddon Partnership | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aAll England Law Reports _v(1993) 3 All ER 467-481(8) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 5 March 1993. L entered a contractual relationship with architects (H) to design a sanctuary for their church. H were for all practical purposes the contractor with power of supervision. L was dissatisfied because of alleged defects in design in relation to ventilation and avoidance of condensation. L issued a writ claiming damages for breach of contract and negligence. H claimed that where there was a contract between the parties, or at least a contract for professional services, there could not, as a matter of law, be a duty of tort. Held, that there could be a duty of care actionable in the tort of negligence where the parties were in a contractual professional relationship. When H had submitted designs these were to help L consider the accommodation and appearance of the building not to detail its technical adequacy. In the absence of actual damage to the person or the property, any loss sustained by L as owners of the building was purely economic and H owed no duty of care t | ||
| 650 | _aDESIGN LIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aDUTY OF CARE | ||
| 650 | _aDUTY OF TORT | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c44122 _d44122 |
||