| 000 | 01147cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3215-92 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u70136 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLoss of windfall | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v5 April 1996, 32(1) |
||
| 520 | _a"Kennedy v K B Van Emden & Co", "Jordan v Gershon Young Finer Green(a firm)", "Burdge and another v Jacobs and others", CA 27 March 1996. A purchaser of property who paid an illegal premium was entitled to be compensated for amount of loss suffered at the date of trial, not at date of solicitor`s breach of duty. The diminution in value rule had no application to assessment of damages, which was not to include compensation for the loss of a windfall to the purchaser. Appeal dismissed in all three cases. | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPENSATION | ||
| 650 | _aDIMINUTION IN VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING ACT 1988 | ||
| 650 | _aILLEGAL PREMIUM | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aRENT ACT 1977 | ||
| 650 | _aSOLICITOR | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c44124 _d44124 |
||