000			01560cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS52277
008			090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u70302
041			_aeng
245			_aMaidstone BC v SoS Environment and Kent CC
260			_c1995
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1995) 69 PCR 1-12(12)
520			_aQBD 28 July 1994. The applicant council (M) owned land formerly used as allotments and now required for a road improvement scheme. In 1990 the county council applied to M for a certificate of appropriate alternative development, contending that planning permission would not be granted for any development save that proposed. M issued a certificate stating that planning permission would have been granted for office, residential or hotel development. The county appealed against that certificate. The Inspector recommended that the certificate be confirmed but the SoS cancelled it, issuing a substitute which certified that planning permission would have been granted for car parking. M`s appeal was dismissed; competing needs for open space could amount to a valid planning objection to the hypothetical development.
650			_aCERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATE ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT
650			_aCOMPENSATION
650			_aCompulsory purchase _96228
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aROAD IMPROVEMENT SCHEME
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c44208 _d44208