000			01605cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS49195
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u70306
041			_aeng
245			_aHussain v Singh and others
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1993) 31 EG 75-78(4)
520			_aCA 6 October 1992. The first defendant (S) allowed the plaintiff (H) to occupy a room on the second floor of a building. The second defendant (B) owned a shop on the ground floor. Following an application by H to the fair rent officer he was arrested as an overstayer and taken into custody for two weeks. S changed the locks on the room. H initiated proceedings and regaining entry to the room. He found that certain property have been removed and B had taken possession. The court granted H a permanent injunction allowing his quiet enjoyment of the room and gave judgement against S for damage for interference with his goods. It was also held that B was not entitled to arrears of rent from H. At appeal B contended that Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 s48 was not a defense to the claim for the arrears of rent revised on a counterclaim. The appeal was allowed in part. S48 of the Act does apply to tenancies created or in existance before the Act came into force and the section also applies to
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1987 S48
650			_aPOSSESSION
650			_aQUIET ENJOYMENT
650			_aRE-ENTRY
650			_aRENT ARREARS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c44210 _d44210