000			01400cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS49222
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u70394
041			_aeng
245			_aR v Holderness BC ex parte James Robert Developments Limited
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1993) 66 PCR 46-60(8)
520			_aCA 4 December 1992. The appellants (J) were speculative builders who acquired a site in a conservation area for development. It had the benefit of outline planning permission. Several applications for full planning permission were made and rejected. The applications were strongly opposed by the parish council which was chaired by a builder in the same area. J appealed for a judicial review claiming a breach of natural justice due to bias. The application stood out of the court listing pending the result of the fourth application which was granted in March 1991. In May 1991 the council chairman lost his seat in the local elections therefore the only issue before the courts was as to costs. The court found no breach of natural justice and ordered J to pay costs. J appealed but this was dismissed.
650			_aNATURAL JUSTICE
650			_aOUTLINE PLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c44264 _d44264